Design and buildFashion / E-commerce · 2026
Aplomb
A fictional couture label built the whole way: name, tagline, cloth weights, thirty two routes and a Figma system behind every one of them. Made to answer what an award level fashion site actually takes.

Why invent a brand
Because the interesting parts of a fashion site are the parts a real client brief never reaches. What the cloth weighs. Whether a collection has an argument or just a name. What the checkout says when it has nothing to sell.
Aplomb is ours. The name is the couture term for how a garment hangs in balance, à plomb, on the plumb line. The line underneath is “cut for the walk, not the mirror”, and the home page opens on two words that set the whole thing: made to fall.
That is not decoration. It is the constraint everything else answers to.

Everything hangs
The signature is structural. Every section opens on a one pixel rail with a monospace ticket sitting on it, and images are hung from the top at different heights rather than aligned to a baseline. Scrolling the page feels like walking past a rail of clothes, because that is literally what the layout is doing.
Collection 04, Stride, has eight pieces and every one carries a real cloth weight in grams per square metre. A coat at 560 and a shirt at 130 are different objects, and a site that treats them as two images at the same size is telling you nothing. The weights are on the page because they are the part a buyer of this kind of clothing actually reads.


The system underneath
Three free typefaces, chosen rather than defaulted: Erode Light for display, Switzer for text, Fragment Mono for the tickets. Paper, ink, wool, and a single accent blue used in doses small enough that most visitors will not consciously register it.
The Figma file is not a pretty export of the site. It is a working system: eleven semantic colour tokens with Paper and Wool modes, so no component needs a light and dark variant at all. A dark section switches the mode and everything inside it flips. Thirty four component masters carry every screen, and all forty three screens, desktop and phone, are drawn from them.
Which makes the interesting claim the boring one: design and code did not drift, because they were the same decisions written twice.


What shipped
Thirty two routes. Product pages, a shop with composition and list views, four collections with lookbooks, five editorial stories, an atelier with an appointment form, a cloth library, a bag that survives a refresh, and a checkout that validates inline and then admits, honestly, that it is a prototype.
The footer is its own piece of work: the wordmark letter spaced across the full width, with a trail of campaign frames that spawn under the letters as the pointer moves and lift away behind them.
It is live at aplomb-psi.vercel.app, and it exists to answer a question we would otherwise have to answer with adjectives.



The best case study is the site itself.